Economic Reality is a Drag on Market Optimism

Download PDF

Stock markets seem to be carrying a false sense of optimism that economic growth is stronger than it actually is. The economic data, however, tells a story that is quite contrary. The US saw 146,000 jobs created in the month of November and Bureau of Labor Statistics claimed that Super storm Sandy had little to no impact. The Canadian economy added a sizeable 59,000 positions in the previous month, and the majority of the gains were full time employment from the private sector, but those numbers are somewhat misleading. The fact of the matter is the numbers that count were actually quite weak. Stock markets have nothing to be optimistic about, and the labor market is just the first place to look for evidence.

To begin with the US, modest estimates are for 90 to 125 thousand jobs to be added on a monthly basis just to keep up with the growth of the labor market. So when, in fact, the US adds 146 thousand, it raises the question around how the unemployment rate really was able to tick down 0.2 percentage points. What gives? For starters, the labor force participation rate is tracking its lowest levels since September of 1981. The number of discourage and underemployed workers will stay at all-time highs until we start to see a change from the US private sector.

The only changes we currently see from the US private sector is preparing for the end of the golden age of tax rates. Quite simply, Americans have been in a fantasy tax land since the Clinton administration of the 1990’s. And the further income tax breaks put in place by George Bush and continued through Barack Obama’s first term have kept them there. The imminent threat that taxes on capital gains and dividends will soon be going up has a number of corporations paying out special dividends allowing investors to take advantage of this year’s current rate.

Despite also being in a golden age of access to credit markets, the US private sector opts to sit idle and await fiscal policy from a non-constructive system of government. As the fiscal cliff attempts to become the most overhyped story in the media, an appeasing solution really presents itself as quite simple: cut entitlements, increase marginal tax rates on higher earners, and allow congress to increase the debt ceiling to continue to pay its bills. Inevitably, we know all three will happen, but not without opposition from the extremes.

To move north, Canada’s job numbers, although looking strong in aggregate, were not indicative of a growing economy. The majority of the gains in the month fell into service sector jobs, and not with the manufacturing and construction sectors, which tend to move in tandem with a strengthening economy. Thus, economic data leads much to be desired and gives a sense that the equity markets seem to be over anticipating what’s to come.

Instead of addressing what to expect as we go into the New Year, I think a more prevalent question is how will the markets finish off 2012, and on what terms will 2013 begin. Markets need more than false sense optimism as a reason to rally. In the US, the economic recovery has dragged on since June of 2009. It’s apparent from the economic data that this recovery is nothing more than mediocre. And as long as it stays this way, the financial markets will be a very uneventful place.

 

Anemic Economic Growth

Download PDF

Canadian GDP in the third quarter advanced at a more anemic pace than that of the previous quarter. Growth amounted to an annualized rate of 0.6 percent and a decline in exports to the US amongst other trading partners weighed heavily on growth. As business investment as well fell off in the quarter, it looks as if the Canadian economy has paused from a Sunday stroll to take a breath.

Part of the decline in exports may be attributed to an appreciating currency and its direct impact on the price of our goods we sell in foreign markets. However, with that in mind and the impact interest announcements have on the nominal exchange rate, there has been an ongoing perception in the financial press and with our central bank themselves that the next interest rate move will be to increase the overnight rate. In the writers opinion, that day is still a long way off.

Central bankers and policy makers see our consumer or household debt levels at very vulnerable levels. In the latest Quarterly Monetary Policy Report from the Bank of Canada, Governor Mark Carney continued to issue his warning that the Canadian household sector remains the biggest risk to our domestic economy. And although raising interest rates is a way to raise the cost of credit to cut some of the marginalized borrowers, it is not the role of Canada’s central bank to blindly target asset bubbles.

In order for the Bank of Canada to raise interest rates, we need to see two changes occur. First, the rate of inflation would need to modestly accelerate. This translates to prices along with wages increasing in a growth environment that allows a central bank to effectively raise interest rates in order to create stability in the price level.

Second, our interest rate policy would have to act accordingly to our neighbor’s to the south. As the US continues down a path of experimental monetary policy which acts to suppress both long and short term rates, a rate hike from our central bank would make our dollar even more popular to outside investors for its potential return. And as the US has pledged to hold rates low until at least the end of 2014, it’s difficult to fathom how our key lending rate could divert from that of the US.

In order to contain household and consumer debt levels, we would be more likely to see policy action from our federal government (who have acted on four separate occasions since 2008 in order to rein in tighter mortgage regulations) than see an interest rate hike from our central bank. This is simply due to the fact that countries continue to pursue expansionary monetary policy to see at best what has been lackluster growth.

Regardless of being in a period of a combination of uncharted monetary and fiscal policy, history can still be applied. It was the rationale of the famous economist Paul Samuelson whom explains when real interest rates, being inflation less the nominal interest rate, fall below 2 percent real assets will attract capital. That may be applied to the housing market, and gold for that matter. There is a plethora of reasoning behind why central banks will not be raising interest rates in the imminent future; anemic growth is only one. That being said, governments can impose and have imposed regulation to cool the housing market.

What about gold?

Loose Monetary Policy and Commodity Based Currencies

Download PDF

The International Monetary Fund, quite simply, is an organization that looks to secure economic and financial stability between its member countries; exchange rate stability is helpful in achieving this. Ultra-easy monetary policies, however, can create instability. Actions from central banks such as quantitative easing that we see in the US, Japan, and Great Britain create worries elsewhere in the world as developing economies particularly (the BRIC’s) see their respective currencies appreciate in foreign exchange markets. Furthermore, their foreign exchange reserves risk losing value as the status of a depreciating US dollar as the international reserve currency remains in question.

Over the last few years, gold bugs loved the idea that central banks have once again become net buyers of the yellow metal. It not only created an increase in demand that helped send the price skyrocketing, but also made apparent that gold was once again regarded as an asset of value with a foreseeable role in international finance. But, it was not just this shift to gold that we will witness from emerging market economies and Asian central banks, according to the IMF; Canadian (CAD) and Australian (AUD) dollars could potentially play that role as well.

The IMF regularly reviews the “Composition of Foreign Exchange Reserves” (COFER) of central banks around the world. The enlisted currencies belong to the economic giants of the developed world: the US dollar, the Euro, the Pound, the Yen, and the Swiss Franc. The reason being, that the fund considers any currency held in a central banks COFER as easily exchangeable, and appropriate for settling international transactions. As of late, those are two characteristics which suit both the CAD and AUD.

The question is, why? And the answer corresponds with the easy monetary policies of the developed economies that are only looking to prevent the onset of a second global recession. The clearest example is in the US. With no help from their government, the US Federal Reserve has kept their domestic economy afloat since 2009. Expansionary monetary policies have kept both long and short term interest rates at sustained lows, and as a result brought back a housing market that looked all but doomed. Quantitative easing effectively held down mortgage rates to entice new buyers and keep existing home owners from going underwater on their mortgage payments. For the sake of their economy, it was a necessity. The consequence, however, was the devaluation of their dollar, which at times saw a decreasing demand from international buyers and created a shift into gold and other currencies.

Inevitably, it is not the fact that the CAD and AUD act as a substitute to the US dollar as countries would not hold our currencies for the prospective dominance we might carry in international markets in the years to come. It’s the fact that both the CAD and AUD are backed by commodity based economies with sound governments. If we were to see an ultimate global recession, which some extreme economists are predicting, no one will be immune. Moreover, in an ever changing global economy, CAD and AUD represent what might be considered the least dirty shirt.

Is Gold Still an Attractive Investment?

Going into November of this year, the S&P500 had returned over 13 per cent, yet over the last few weeks we have seen equity markets give much of their gains back (see Figure 1). Gold, however, at this point seems to look rather resilient. As uncertainty in the global market place continues to be a common theme the insurance of preserving an investor’s wealth, which may be provided by precious metals, is becoming more and more apparent.

S&P vs TSX

Two events continue to cast a shadow over the global market place. The more prevalent one as of late is the on-going negotiation surrounding the US fiscal cliff, and this is complemented by the inability of lawmakers in Washington to compromise and work together to put forth a deal. Ostensibly, it seems without doubt that the US Federal government will be able to both cut spending and raise government revenues from taxes in order to avoid economic contraction, but for some reason equity markets do not seem to be reacting in accordance just yet.

The second follows a similar tune of what has continued to roil financial markets since 2009. The Euro Zone has now entered into a double dip recession, and as we look forward the near term outlook is only for it to get worse.

What were economic power houses like Germany and France advanced in the last quarter at extremely modest paces of 0.2 per cent respectively, and this as their growth is forecasted to turn negative next quarter. Furthermore, this recipe for economic contraction is fed by social unrest in the peripheral Euro Zone nations stemmed from continued budget cuts and high youth unemployment.

The greatest threat to Euro Zone remains these populist movements from extremist political parties in countries like Greece that would only act to cut off their nose to spite their face. Where with some potential and hope for a US economy to get back on track, Europe still remains heavily in question.

Since the Sub-Prime Mortgage crises in 2008, global uncertainty has been a common theme continuously associated with financial markets. And while conditions seemed to have calmed in North America and we are not seeing the rampant volatility of the past few years, developed nations are still feeling the burden of sovereign debt and its hindrance on growth remains in place. It becomes very difficult to fathom why a forward looking stock market would produce what might be deemed “normal returns” when countries like Canada and the US advance at around 2 per cent, and Europe collectively is contracting.

The aforementioned reasons add to why gold still remains as attractive as ever. Not even for the potential returns that some investors expect to see as we are over 10 years into what has been a very lucrative bull market. But rather that in periods of economic uncertainty, it is the preservation of wealth that is of greatest importance and exposure to gold plays a role in that.